Study focuses on what bite victims are thinking (c) 2015-2018 Frania Shelley-
Grielen all rights reserved

Conventional approaches to dog bite prevention focus on what a dog is “saying”
through behavior but a recent study published in the  
Journal of Veterinary Behavior
by researchers Carri Westgarth and Francine Watkins shifts the focus to what people
are thinking instead, especially when those thoughts are “it will never happen to me.”

In the research, conducted in England, eight women were interviewed about their
experiences with being bitten by dogs. The study discusses concerns with the growing
number of dog bites (which may be actually difficult to determine as they are often not
reported if medical attention is not warranted) along with the effectiveness of bite
prevention. Avoiding bites centers on paying careful and close attention to canine body
language and responding to signals that a bite is forthcoming. These signals are often
categorized in animal behavior as “distance increasing behaviors.”  Because fighting is
costly from a biological perspective (injuries prevent hunting, foraging, mating and more),
ritualized threat displays from hissing to growling to snapping or roaring, etc. usually end
with one of the animals deferring to the other and moving away. In Westgarth and
Watkins’ study impediments to an appropriate response of deference to warning signals of
a forthcoming bite are listed as: 1) not interacting with the dog prior to the bite (or being in
the wrong place at the wrong time as in running past a dog that bites at people who run),
2) the location and context of the event (a play bite or a bite to a burglar in the home

cannot be equated to biting without provocation in public) and 3) whether or not the
individual believes in the seriousness of the warning along with their capability and
facility in stopping the bite from happening.

While there is much to discuss about dog bites and the how’s and what’s and why’s and
where’s of the factors surrounding them, Westgarth and Watkins highlight a factor we
often neglect in the discussion; that we can skip over most of what is relevant to the dogs
when it is not relevant to us.

The researchers found that all study participants knew about dog bog behavior and
believed this understanding and past exposure should have enabled them to respond
more appropriately and evade the bite. But they did not respond appropriately. This lack
of an appropriate response stems mostly from an overarching belief of “it would not

happen to me.” And it may also be that this belief also goes along with another belief, one
that says that because one knows about dogs one is exempted from listening to them at
times. The limitations of these beliefs are noted eloquently by Westgarth and Watkins:
“When the danger of a dog bite occurring is considered low, behaviour change is unlikely
to occur.  Even if participants have been bitten before they still held the belief that ‘it
would not happen to me.” This makes it difficult to know how to target interventions. If
there is no perceived need, there is no need to participate in education, or to act upon any
new knowledge, because the person does not believe a bite will happen to them, or could
happen again. They will have little regard or follow-thorough for interventions that
educate about how to take preventative action. Therefore, their behaviour will not
change.”

People I work with often talk about their belief that their love, affection and knowledge

of dogs is, they believe, apparent to all dogs, not just the dogs which with they have
relationships. Additionally, we often also place a burden of “trust” on our own dogs not
to indulge natural (and necessary) defensive canine behavior by virtue of our relationship
to them. In the study in question as one of the participant’s notes: “…I knew he’d go for me
but you kind of expect that when you’ve got that trust bond with your dogs that maybe
they wouldn’t, even if you do something to upset them, so that’s probably why it upset
me because I was maybe expecting him not to be like that even though I knew that he
would kind of thing so. It’s silly really…”

Silly and when you think of it, unfair. Thinking and wanting dogs not to have personal

space that needs respecting because we would like to interact with them however we
want and not on their terms is both silly and unfair. So is ignoring the warning signs of
stress and discomfort because we do not believe they should apply to us. Our love and
knowledge for and about dogs do not make an exception of our need to listen and respond
appropriately to what a dog is clearly telling us.

Having been bitten for similar reasons, I carry a small scar on one hand. It is a constant
reminder that when working with animals one needs to always know that they have

much to say and much attention needs to be paid to it and if I am someone who is
fortunate enough to understand what is being said than I am obligated by the love and
understanding I have for animals to listen them.

This article is an original work and is subject to copyright. You may create a link to this
article on another website or in a document back to this web page. You may not copy this
article in whole or in part onto another web page or document without permission of the
author. Email inquiries to info@animalbehaviorist.us


References
Westgarth, C., Watkins, F. (2015). A qualitative investigation of the perceptions of female dog bite victims and
implications for the prevention of dog bites.
Journal of Veterinary Behavior (10) 479-488
Why
professionals
think they won't
get bitten
Professionals who work with dogs mistakenly believe dogs will not bite them
“When the danger of a dog bite
behaviour change is unlikely to
occur. Even if participants have
been bitten before they still held

the belief that ‘it would not
happen to me.”  This makes it
difficult to know how to target
interventions. If there is no

perceived need, there is no
need to participate in
education, or to act upon any
new knowledge, because the
person does not believe a bite
will happen to them, or could
happen again. They will have
little regard or follow-thorough
for interventions that educate
about how to take preventative
action. Therefore, their

behaviour will not change.”
USAG Humphries
Request a consultation
info@animalbehaviorist.us

Entire website copyright Frania Shelley-Grielen
AnimalBehaviorist.us is a participant in the Amazon
Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate
advertising program designed to provide a means for
sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and
linking to Amazon.com
.


Best viewed in   
Google Chrome